![]() |
Thank you, from the Foods of the World Forums! |
fake fish |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Tom Kurth
Chef's Apprentice
Joined: 10 May 2015 Location: Alma, MO Status: Offline Points: 251 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: fake fishPosted: 07 May 2019 at 17:26 |
|
I read occasionally of fish that is sold as another species than what it really is. About the only fish we bring home that isn't in a can is cod. Some of what we get is nice, big flaked and tasty--sometimes even with that mild, buttery flavor we love in cod. Sometimes, it is tough, stringy and strongly fishy, what the mother-in-law refers too as mattress stuffing. Oftentimes, we get both from the same store and in the same packaging. My question: How can you tell generally what you are getting? And how, specifically can you tell if what is being sold as codfish is indeed codfish? Thanks.
|
|
|
Best,
Tom Escape to Missouri |
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
Hoser
Admin Group
Joined: 06 February 2010 Location: Cumberland, RI Status: Offline Points: 3454 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 May 2019 at 02:37 |
|
The most commonly substituted fish for cod is Pollock....could be what you're getting here. Not much of a problem here in new England, but I can see where it would be elsewhere.
Out here if we purchase scrod we are getting "catch of the day" whitefish. Could be cod, halibut, hake, pollock or haddock....all great fish, but with obvious subtle or not-so-subtle differences in texture or taste. Here's an FDA link that may help a bit. |
|
|
Go ahead...play with your food!
|
|
![]() |
|
HistoricFoodie
Admin Group
Joined: 21 February 2012 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 4945 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 May 2019 at 12:18 |
|
Plus, let's not forget, that much of what is sold in markets is "Pacific Cod," whatever that is. Certainly not the Atlantic Cod of song and legend.
There is, unfortunately, nothing new about this practice. When I was a kid, back when there were wolves in Wales and snakes still in Ireland, all "sea scallops" were exactly the same size. Turns out they weren't scallops at all, but, rather, the flesh of skates that had been punched out to resemble scallops. I'm not so concerned with the name differences, as with the quality differences Tom refers to. "Tough, stringy, and fishy," to me says that whatever the fish started out as it has been mishandled along the way. I found it ironic that the FDA list included a sub for the more expensive Orange Roughy, which, itself, had been something of a trash fish with an off-putting name (dogfish, maybe?) until Aussie marketing types renamed it and built it into a highly desirable species.
|
|
|
But we hae meat and we can eat
And sae the Lord be thanket |
|
![]() |
|
HistoricFoodie
Admin Group
Joined: 21 February 2012 Location: Kentucky Status: Offline Points: 4945 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 May 2019 at 12:23 |
|
OK, did a quick search. Orange Roughy was originally known as slimefish, and few people were interested in it. Which is understandable. Now, thanks to heavy marketing and over-fishing, it is red-tagged---which means very endangered.
That, of course, is the story of Atlantic Cod (sans the name change). The Banks were so overfished that Atlantic Cod were all but extinct. Scrod, in fact, at least in Mass., was actually "baby" cod. It's kind of sad to see what it's come to.
|
|
|
But we hae meat and we can eat
And sae the Lord be thanket |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |